ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026
Plasma metabolomic signatures in patients with multidrug-resistant bacterial sepsis.
Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of immune cell mitochondrial dysfunction characteristics and clinical predictive biomarkers in sepsis via multi-cohort machine learning and single-cell RNA sequencing.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveMultidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections are a leading cause of sepsis-related death. A rapid method to identify patients with MDR infections upon hospital admission is urgently needed. This study aimed to characterize the distinct plasma metabolomic signatures associated with MDR gram-positive (G+) and gram-negative (G-) sepsis and to develop predictive models for rapid, risk stratification during the initial clinical encounter.
methodsTwo independent cohorts of septic patients were recruited, with 198 subjects (117 MDR and 81 susceptible) in the discovery cohort, and 198 patients (95 MDR and 103 susceptible) in the validation cohort. Plasma metabolomic profiling was performed using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Multiple machine learning algorithms were employed to identify differential metabolomic signatures and to construct and validate multi-metabolite models for the early identification of MDR bacteria.
resultsDistinct metabolomic signatures were identified for both MDR G- and G+ infections. MDR G- sepsis showed significant elevations in metabolites related to host inflammatory responses, such as histamine, alongside decreased levels of gut microbiota-derived metabolites, including cholic acid and benzoic acid, indicating profound host-microbe dysregulation. Conversely, MDR G+ sepsis was characterized by alterations in energy and amino acid metabolism, notably elevated 2-hydroxyglutarate, a marker of mitochondrial stress. An 8-metabolite model for MDR G- infection achieved excellent discrimination in both the discovery (AUROC = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.787-0.982) and validation (AUROC = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.782-0.951) cohorts. The model for MDR G+ infection demonstrated good predictive performance (AUROC = 0.763 and 0.715 in discovery and validation, respectively).
conclusionThis study identifies robust and distinct plasma metabolomic signatures that differentiate MDR from antibiotic-susceptible sepsis. These findings support the development of rapid, metabolomics-based testing using admission plasma to risk-stratify patients. This approach could guide early, stewardship-aligned antimicrobial decisions while conventional culture results are pending, potentially improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.