ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
An Exploratory Analysis of Trauma and Substance Use Disorder Inpatient Treatment for Public Safety Personnel, Military Members, and Veterans.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals who work within a public safety organization, as well as the military, are particularly vulnerable to mental disorders due to the psychological risks associated with their professions. There are evidence-based interventions that support the treatment and management of these occupational stress injuries (OSIs); however, less is known about the unique contributions of the specific components of these interventions when provided within an inpatient setting, particularly for occupation-specific populations. Therefore, a gap in the literature is determining what portion of the change observed in the service users can be attributed to the therapy itself versus optional elements of the treatment program. Inspired by the component analysis methodology, we conducted an exploratory observational study and examined the clinical outcomes for 345 inpatients at a mental health facility designed to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (and substance use disorders if present) in public safety personnel and active/retired military members. Overall, we found that service users demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in their symptoms. Despite this, we did not see different results between service users who differentially participated in optional programming that included adjunct psychotherapy and exposure work, with the exception of participation in a specific holistic practice called integrative restoration which may support depressive symptoms specifically. Further research is needed to better understand what is contributing to the treatment outcomes and differences observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41663818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.