ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent MDT treatment decision making for stage III NSCLC using dual level embedding and three level explanation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents complex challenges in treatment decisions due to extensive disease characteristics and patient heterogeneity. Multidisciplinary teams (MDT) offer personalized treatments by integrating diverse expertise. However, resource and time constraints limit MDT practicality in healthcare. Addressing this, we propose an interpretable approach for intelligent MDT treatment recommendations. Our approach focuses on enhancing clinical text representation and the interpretability of recommendations. Using a dual-level embedding technique, the local and global textual information can be captured. By delving into intricate factors at word, phrase, and sentence levels, we explain treatment recommendations for heterogeneous patients. Specially, attention flow is employed to consider the relationship between attentions across multiple layers, and attention mechanisms screen out important words and sentences. Our method achieves over 85% across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score in stage III NSCLC treatment recommendations. Furthermore, we assess the association between our proposed model and patient survival outcomes by analyzing patients who did not undergo MDT consultation. The results demonstrate that patients receiving model-concordant treatments exhibited significantly higher survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to those receiving model-nonconcordant treatments. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirm the improvement in survival outcomes associated with model-concordant treatments. Additionally, ablation analysis validates the rationality of the model structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.