ArticleCommunications biology2026
Interactions between sensory-biased and supramodal working memory networks in the human cerebral cortex.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human working memory is supported by a broadly distributed set of brain networks. Content-specific networks communicate with a domain-general, supramodal network that is recruited regardless of the type of content. Here, we contrasted visual and auditory working memory tasks to examine interactions between the supramodal network and two content-specific networks. Functional connectivity among visual-biased, auditory-biased, and supramodal working memory networks was assayed by collecting task and resting-state fMRI data from 24 human participants (age 18-43; 11 men and 13 women). At rest, as found previously, the supramodal network exhibited stronger functional connectivity with the visual-biased network than with the auditory-biased network. This asymmetry raises questions about how networks communicate to support robust performance across modalities. However, during auditory task performance, dynamic changes increased auditory network connectivity with supramodal and visual-biased frontal regions, while decreasing connectivity from posterior visual areas to supramodal and frontal visual regions. In contrast, the visual task produced weak changes. Across individuals, auditory working memory precision correlated with the strength of auditory network connectivity changes, while no such brain-behavior link was observed for visual working memory. These results demonstrate an asymmetry in working memory network organization and reveal that dynamic reorganization accompanies performance of working memory tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.