SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Forehead Length Reduction Surgery: Quantifying Complications and Outcomes Through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForehead reduction surgery is increasingly performed to improve facial balance and harmony. Although generally considered safe, complication rates and outcomes have not been systematically quantified.
methodsA systematic review and proportional meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through August 2025. Eligible studies included ≥10 adult patients undergoing forehead reduction surgery and reporting at least one complication. Data extraction was performed in duplicate, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Pooled complication rates were calculated using a random-effects generalized linear mixed model, with heterogeneity assessed by I
resultsFourteen studies involving 3,213 patients were included; most were female and aged 16-76. Most were retrospective case series, with one prospective cohort and one cross-sectional study. The pooled overall complication rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 3.2-10.7%; I
conclusionHairline-lowering surgery demonstrates a favorable safety profile, with low complication rates, manageable adverse events, and nearly universal patient satisfaction. Clinically, these findings support the procedure as a safe and effective option in contemporary facial aesthetic practice. Future research should incorporate standardized outcome definitions, validated PROMs, and more diverse populations to optimize comparability and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41663770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.