Trial reportScientific reports2026
Musician presence and its effects on physiological and psychological well-being in live versus livestreamed concerts.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listening to music, whether live or prerecorded, can benefit health and well-being. Studies have shown that music can alleviate pain and anxiety, improve emotional well-being, and strengthen social connectedness. While research on live music is promising, direct comparisons with recorded settings-specifically in relation to the physical co-presence of performing musicians-are limited. In this randomized controlled pilot study (n = 130), we examined the effects of live music concerts (classical and pop) compared to a simultaneous cinematic livestream, in a parallel design. Psychological and physiological well-being were assessed through self-reported questionnaires and physiological measures, including heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). In the live condition, participants reported greater appreciation for the music, felt more moved by the music as indicated by higher kama muta scores, and reported higher arousal and valence compared to the livestream condition. Using linear mixed models, we found that only the mean HR was significantly higher in the live group, whereas other HRV parameters did not show statistically significant differences. In conclusion, the "liveness"-in terms of the musicians being physical present-emerges as an important aspect shaping audience's subjective experiences and physiological responses, particularly HR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.