ArticleScientific reports2026
Objective suturing skill assessment in a hands-on course increases medical students' aspiration to become surgeons.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether suture training and objective evaluation contributed to an increase in the number of students who wanted to become surgeons. Medical students received two hours of suture training during hospital-based clerkship. An objective assessment system (A-LAP mini) was used to evaluate suturing skills objectively and assess progress. Before and after training, the level of aspiration to become a surgeon was surveyed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Two hundred fifteen students participated in suture training, and complete data were obtained from 185 students. The VAS score for aspiration to become a surgeon before training was 60 [35-79] and significantly increased to 65 [45-85] after the training (p < 0.001). Students with a VAS score of ≥ 50 before training were defined as the S group and Students with a VAS score of < 50 before training were defined as the P group. The VAS for expectations for training (I am excited about the training) was significantly higher in the S group than in the P group (S vs. P = 85.30 ± 15.69 vs. 73.97 ± 22.89, p < 0.001). Also, the VAS for enjoying the training (I enjoyed the training) was significantly higher in the S group than in the P group (S vs. P = 94.39 ± 8.14 vs. 90.13 ± 12.99, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in other factors. Students with lower aspirations to become surgeons found the task more challenging than their peers. Suture training with objective evaluation motivated medical students to become surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.