Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Rivers constrain female but not male dispersal and genetic structure in brown bears.

Robert Spitzer, Anita J Norman, Michael Schneider, Ellinor Sahlén, Göran Spong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert SpitzerDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden. robert.spitzer@slu.se.
Anita J NormanDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Michael SchneiderVästerbotten County Administration, Umeå, Sweden.
Ellinor SahlénVästerbotten County Administration, Umeå, Sweden.
Göran SpongDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding landscape barriers to connectivity is essential for studying wildlife population dynamics and developing conservation strategies that promote genetic exchange. Rivers can fragment landscapes and thereby influence genetic metapopulation structure by restricting individual movement and gene flow, yet their impact on brown bear (Ursus arctos) dispersal remains poorly understood. Using a large dataset (N = 519) of SNP-genotypes (96 loci) from fecal samples, we investigated the effects of rivers on sex-specific movement patterns, primarily dispersal and genetic structure in brown bears in northern Sweden. We found that males dispersed over twice as far as females (mean 56.4 km vs. 22.8 km) and crossed rivers significantly more often (42% of male vs. 11% of female dispersals; χ

Indexed as

Animal DistributionRiversUrsidaeAnimalsFemaleGene FlowGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsSwedenConservation genomicsDispersalNon-invasive genetic samplingSNPUrsus arctos

Identifiers

PMID41663591
PMCPMC12891673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.