ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Clinical and radiological outcomes of Inlay versus Onlay humeral stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 145° neck shaft angle: a multicentre retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of three years, an analysis from the registry of the shoulder friends institute.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the original Paul Grammont Inlay design had a 155° neck-shaft angle (NSA), developments in humeral stem designs have led to the emergence of the Onlay design with a more vertical angle. The purpose of the study is to compare three year clinical and radiological outcomes of two humeral stem designs, namely Inlay versus Onlay designs, with a 145° NSA and identical glenoid component.
methodsIn this multicentric retrospective study, 227 patients (141 Inlay versus 86 Onlay) that underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between March 2019 and April 2020, were reviewed at a minimum follow-up of three years. Clinical evaluation included pain on visual analogue scale (VAS), active range of motion, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and Constant score. Radiological assessment included in situ stem inclination, cortical contact bone remodelling, and scapular notching.
resultsThe two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, and follow-up (mean follow-up, 3.3 ± 0.5 years). No significant differences were found for pain on VAS, SSV or Constant score. The Onlay group had significantly greater external rotation with 90° of abduction (ISA-Inlay, 52.2 ± 24.2; versus ISA-Onlay, 59.2 ± 25; p = 0.037), more valgus alignment (ISA-Inlay, -0.573; versus ISA-Onlay, -5.55; p < 0.001), and a higher rate of cortical contact (ISA-Inlay, 9%; versus ISA-Onlay, 39%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in terms of bone remodelling around the stem and scapular notching.
conclusionAt a follow up of three years, both humeral stem designs resulted in comparable clinical and radiological outcomes, while the Onlay design seemed to improve external rotation without increasing the risk of bony complications. The choice of stem design should be motivated by patient specific functional needs and surgeon experience. However, the conclusions of the present study are limited to mid-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41663586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.