ArticleScientific reports2026
Patient address parsing via KG-aware contrastive learning and constrained on-prem LLM inference.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Address parsing seeks to map noisy, abbreviated free-text addresses into standardized hierarchical tuples for large-scale information systems. Existing approaches struggle with semantic and structural ambiguity, hallucination from unconstrained generation, and deployment constraints under privacy and governance requirements. We present AddrKG-LLM, a two-stage framework that combines knowledge-graph (KG)-aware retrieval with schema-restricted large language model (LLM) decoding. First, contrastive learning over multi-view administrative graphs yields node embeddings that retrieve and re-rank a compact Top-K candidate set, thereby bounding the search space while preserving high gold coverage (Recall@K). Second, a candidate-restricted decoder running on-premises produces JSON-compliant outputs, enforcing single-candidate field consistency and alignment with KG priors to improve controllability and policy compliance. Using de-identified real-world records, we evaluate structural consistency via micro-level accuracy ([Formula: see text]) and macro-level accuracy ([Formula: see text]), and assess system properties with Recall@K and latency. Across strong string-matching, sequence-labeling, and generic LLM baselines, AddrKG-LLM delivers consistent gains in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with a favorable Recall@K. The proposed method consists of three components: (i) multi-view graph aggregation, (ii) a hierarchy-aware self-supervised contrastive objective that derives positives/negatives from administrative relations to align textual and graph embeddings, and (iii) candidate-restricted decoding within the KG-derived Top-K set. Overall, coupling KG-aware retrieval with constrained on-prem LLM decoding yields an accurate, controllable, and deployable solution for noisy-address structuring across domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.