Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663558›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Derivation and validation of a machine learning-driven score to predict the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy.

Christian Basile, Christian L Polte, Piero Gentile, Entela Bollano, Araz Rawshani, Anders Oldfors, Charlotta Ljungman, Sven-Erik Bartfay, Pia Dahlberg, Clara Hjalmarsson and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Christian BasileDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian L PolteDepartments of Clinical Physiology and Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Piero GentileDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Entela BollanoDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Araz RawshaniDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders OldforsDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Charlotta LjungmanDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sven-Erik BartfayDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pia DahlbergDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clara HjalmarssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marie BjörkenstamDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elena GualiniDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Antonio CannatáDepartment of Cardiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Patrizia PedrottiDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GarasciaDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianluigi SavareseDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aldo Pietro MaggioniANMCO Research Center, Heart Care Foundation, Florence, Italy.
Kristjan KarasonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emanuele BobbioDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. emanuele.bobbio@vgregion.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its low diagnostic yield, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold standard for establishing a definitive diagnosis in many cardiomyopathies. We developed and validated a machine-learning-based score to predict the likelihood of diagnostic EMB using non-invasive data. We retrospectively analyzed 775 heart failure patients who underwent EMB. A random forest algorithm was selected for score development based on superior discriminative performance. The model was externally validated in an independent cohort (n = 171). The study population was predominantly male (72.1%), with half of the patients in NYHA class III-IV. EMB yielded a definitive diagnosis in 19.9% of cases, most commonly amyloidosis (50%). A predictive score (0-100 range) was derived from key non-invasive predictors. Right ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by left ventricular and atrial LGE, NTproBNP levels, and renal function. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89-0.96) in cross-validation and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.86-0.98) in the testing set, with consistent performance on external validation (AUC 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76-0.89). This machine-learning-based score may provide a non-invasive tool to support EMB decision-making in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID41663558
PMCPMC12996545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.