ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
A comparative study of clinical and radiographic outcomes in total knee arthroplasty assisted by the CT-free Smith & Nephew CORI robotic system versus the Brainlab Knee3 navigation system.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The CT-free Smith & Nephew CORI robotic system and the Brainlab Knee3 navigation system represent two distinct technological approaches for assisting total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this retrospective comparative study, 100 consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent TKA from December 2020 to June 2025 were allocated to either a robotic-assisted group (n = 50) utilizing the CT-free CORI system or a navigation-assisted group (n = 50) utilizing the Brainlab Knee3 system. Perioperative parameters, early and mid-term functional scores, radiographic alignment, complications, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. The results demonstrated that while both systems achieved comparable long-term functional outcomes and similar safety profiles, the CORI robotic system showed distinct advantages. It significantly reduced osteotomy time, total operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. Patients in the CORI group also experienced less early postoperative pain, better knee function, and higher range of motion at 3 days postoperatively. Radiographically, the CORI group achieved superior accuracy in restoring the hip-knee-ankle angle and controlling the coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components. These findings suggest that although both systems are effective for TKA, the CORI robotic system offers enhanced operative efficiency, reduced early surgical trauma, faster initial recovery, and improved precision in achieving targeted mechanical alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.