Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663537›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Relatives in the context of assisted dying: challenges and support needs].

Birgit Wagner, Laura Hofmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Birgit WagnerAbteilung für Klinische Psychologie, Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Straße 50, 14197, Berlin, Deutschland. birgit.wagner@medicalschool-berlin.de.
Laura HofmannAbteilung für Klinische Psychologie, Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Straße 50, 14197, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decision to pursue physician-assisted dying can place a significant emotional burden on relatives. Despite the considerable psychosocial stress they often face, these individuals have received limited attention in research, clinical practice and ethical or societal debates surrounding this topic. This article provides an overview of the role of relatives in the context of physician-assisted dying.Previous studies indicate that relatives are frequently confronted with moral dilemmas, ambivalent emotions and anticipatory grief. In addition, they often take on organisational responsibilities in support of the person wishing to die and may experience stigma and subsequent social isolation. Research also suggests that relatives and close friends are at increased risk for mental health challenges.At the same time, certain aspects of the process, such as the opportunity to say goodbye, open communication and the active involvement of relatives, can have a positive effect and support a more adaptive grieving process. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial support for relatives as well as the necessity of involving them at an early stage throughout the entire process.

Indexed as

FamilyProfessional-Family RelationsSocial SupportSuicide, AssistedGermanyGriefHumansDepressionGriefPersistent grief disorderPhysician-assisted dyingPTSD

Identifiers

PMID41663537
PMCPMC12956949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.