ArticleScientific reports2026
Building user trust in AI chatbots for customer service through human-like cues and perceived reliability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trust and interaction design in AI-enabled systems: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital health information-seeking behaviors and trust in AI-based physician chatbots among patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The effects of responsiveness, perceived warmth, and anthropomorphism on university students' use of conversational AI for learning support: a chain mediation analysis based on S-O-R framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This qualitative study explores how human-like cues and system competence shape users’ trust and perceptions of reliability in AI-driven chatbot customer service. Data were collected from 28 participants through semi-structured interviews conducted in Pakistan and China. Using thematic analysis supported by NVivo 15, the study identifies key patterns in the formation of user trust and interaction experiences. Two main themes emerged: human-like interaction and emotional connection, and perceived reliability and system competence. The first highlights conversational naturalness, empathy, personalisation, and social presence as drivers of affective trust. In contrast, the second emphasises accuracy, transparency, responsiveness, and data security as core elements of cognitive trust. Together, these dimensions illustrate how emotional and functional factors jointly influence user confidence and satisfaction with chatbots. Beyond reaffirming established trust constructs, the study offers context-specific qualitative insights that deepen understanding of how users in a developing market interpret and negotiate trust in AI-mediated service interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.