ArticleScientific reports2026
Modeling and optimizing the delamination factor in Agave americana L. biowaste fiber-reinforced biocomposite drilling: a study using RSM and ANN methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how key drilling parameters—feed rate (f), spindle speed (N), and drill diameter (d)—affect the delamination factor (Fd) during the machining of the Flower stalk of Agave americana (FSAa) fiber-reinforced biocomposites, using High-Speed Steel (HSS) and High-Speed Steel Coated with Titanium (HSS-TiN) tools. The experimental results show that increasing f and d leads to a decrease in Fd, reaching a minimum of 1.074 with the HSS tool compared to 1.020 with the HSS-TiN (N = 800 rpm, f = 150 mm/min, d = 5 mm). Conversely, a higher rotational speed slightly reduces delamination, with a maximum Fd of 1.204 obtained with HSS-TiN (N = 1600 rpm, f = 50 mm/min, d = 10 mm), compared to 1.261 for HSS under the same conditions. A comparative analysis shows that the HSS-TiN tool consistently outperforms the uncoated HSS tool, offering lower delamination levels due to reduced friction and better wear resistance. Modeling with response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) was developed to predict Fd, with both models showing excellent agreement with experimental data. For HSS-TiN, the ANN model achieved a coefficient of determination R² of 98.94%, surpassing that of the RSM model, which was 98.11%. Similarly, for HSS, ANN obtained an R2 of 98.82%, slightly higher than that of RSM (98.04%), thus confirming the superior predictive capacity of the neural approach in both cases. The optimized numerical model for the delamination factor of the biocomposite using HSS-TiN tool showed the lowest delamination factor of 1.019 for a drill diameter of 9.97 mm, a feed rate of 138.59 mm/min and a spindle speed of 817.04 rev/min. The findings highlight the potential of surface-coated tools and advanced modeling techniques in improving drilling quality for sustainable composite materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.