Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663493›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Replacing soil with waste gangue for the ecological remediation of mining areas facilitated by plant-promoting microorganisms and porous materials.

Bo Zhang, Dong Ma, Xingxing Zhou, Lingmei Li, Li Li, Guangsheng Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo ZhangCollege of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shiyan Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Eco-Environmental Protection, Hanjiang Normal University, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Dong MaSchool of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, People's Republic of China.
Xingxing ZhouCollege of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shiyan Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Eco-Environmental Protection, Hanjiang Normal University, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Lingmei LiCollege of Life Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, 110034, People's Republic of China.
Li LiCollege of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shiyan Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Eco-Environmental Protection, Hanjiang Normal University, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Guangsheng QianDepartment of Ocean Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, 999078, People's Republic of China. guangshengqian@foxmail.com.

Funding

Key Program of Datang Environmental Industry Group Co., Ltd. DTHJ-2025-10445Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation Program 2025-BS-0791National Natural Science Foundation of China 52300023School-level Scientific Research Program of Hanjiang Normal University XJ2025A07Shiyan City Guided Scientific Research Project YDKY20250100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coal-mining byproducts like coal gangue (CG), green mudstone (GC), and oil shale (OS) pose significant risks to the ecological environment and social safety. In this study, waste gangue was treated in situ without supplementary soil addition. Moreover, the effects of plant growth substrates prepared by incorporating chicken manure (+), plant growth-promoting microorganisms (+M), and porous materials (+MM) on soil nutrients, plant growth, and microbial communities were investigated. Compared with untreated gangue, organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, available nitrogen, and available phosphorus in the CG + MM, OS + MM, and GC + MM groups increased by 170%, 14%, 93%, 174%, 1951%; 51%, 15%, 262%, 147%, 480%; and 230%, 23%, 85%, 78%, 1,186%, respectively. Regarding plant growth, CG had no significant effect on Lolium growth, whereas GC and OS drastically decreased Lolium biomass. However, the addition of exogenous substances promoted Lolium growth. Microbial community network analysis confirmed the presence of Bdellovibrio, Halomonas, Nocardioides, Sphingobacterium, Streptomyces, and WD2101 soil groups in the CG group; Bdellovibrio, Chloroplast, Lysobacter, Methylophaga, and WD2101 soil groups in the GC group; and Antarcticibacterium, Chloroplast, Methylophaga, Paracoccus, Pontibacter, and Rhodonellum in the OS group. All microbes played key roles in maintaining the microbial community structure. These findings provide novel insights into the ecological restoration of gangue.

Indexed as

Environmental Restoration and RemediationMiningSoilSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCoal MiningNitrogenPhosphorusPlant DevelopmentPorosityNitrogenPhosphorusSoilGangue utilizationMining restorationPot experimentTailings substrate

Identifiers

PMID41663493
PMCPMC12949124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.