Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663471›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multinomial probability model of radiation induced DSB and non-DSB clusters: tandem and bistranded damage clusters.

Francis A Cucinotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francis A CucinottaHealth Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 453037, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-3037, USA. Francis.Cucinotta@UNLV.EDU.

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0025298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments have shown that non-double strand break (DSB) clustered damage consisting of two or more base damages (BDs) or BD with single strand breaks (SSBs) occur with higher frequency than DSBs after ionizing radiation exposure. However experiments that measure tandem non-DSB clusters have not been developed. I develop a probability model of clustered damage that is combined with energy imparted spectra to predict the relative contributions of tandem and bistranded non-DSB clustered damage. The model considers probabilities for direct damage to sugar-phosphate moieties leading to SSBs, direct damage to DNA bases leading to abasic or oxidized sites, and indirect damage leading to radical formation with subsequent SSB and BD formation. Additional probabilities account for relative location of SSB and BD to model damage clusters. The model predicts for electrons and ions the relative contribution of tandem or bistranded lesions, the larger occurrence of clustered non-DSBs compared to DSBs, and the predominance of mixtures of damage types. Predictions of ratios of non-DSB clusters to DSB of 4-to-6 are found for electrons and high energy ions. The model provides an accurate method to predict DSB and non-DSB damage clusters as a function of radiation modality and to model resulting damage processing.

Indexed as

Clustered DNA damageDouble strand breaksHeavy ionsLow dose radiationRadiation cancer therapySpace radiation

Identifiers

PMID41663471
PMCPMC12954070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.