Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663458›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Phenotypic classification of opium poppy genotypes (Papaver somniferum L.) based on morpho-phenological traits.

Yasin Özgen, Nilgun Bayraktar, Ugur Ozkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasin ÖzgenFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nilgun BayraktarFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ugur OzkanFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ugurozkan@ankara.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) genotypes based on phenotypic variation is essential for efficient breeding programs targeting specific traits such as flower and seed color. Opium poppy populations exhibit considerable variation in their morpho-phenological traits, particularly in flower and seed color, which is the focus of the present study. Descriptive plant measurements used to classify flower and seed color included germination time, flowering time, maturity time, plant height, number of capsules per plant, capsule length, capsule width, stigma rays, seed/capsule percentage, capsule yield per plant, seed yield per plant, capsule yield, seed yield, 1000-seed weight, morphine content, noscapine content, morphine yield, and noscapine yield. The opium poppy dataset (nrow = 200) was divided into a training subset (70%) (nrow = 140) and a test subset (30%) (nrow = 60). ML algorithms, including Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), weighted k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ), and two decision-tree-based classification algorithms, bagging CART and Random Forest, were used for classification. According to the classification of flower and seed colors, the classification accuracies of Naïve Bayes, SVM, Weighted k-NN, and LVQ were found to be 95.00%, 91.67%, 78.33%, and 60.00% for flower color, and 78.33%, 91.67%, 50.00%, and 50.00%, respectively. Naïve Bayes and SVM classification yielded more accurate results for FC and SC, respectively.

Indexed as

PapaverBayes TheoremClassification AlgorithmsFlowersGenotypeMorphineNoscapinePhenotypeSeedsSupport Vector MachineMorphineNoscapineAlkaloidBreedingMorphineNoscapineSeed

Identifiers

PMID41663458
PMCPMC12957527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.