ArticleNature communications2026
iMOE: prediction of second-life battery degradation trajectory using interpretable mixture of experts.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retired electric vehicle batteries offer immense potential to support energy infrastructure stability in underdeveloped regions through second-life use, but uncertainties in battery degradation behaviors pose major safety concerns. This work proposes an interpretable mixture of experts (iMOE) network that predicts battery degradation trajectories using partial, field-accessible signals in a single cycling operation. iMOE leverages an adaptive multi-degradation prediction module to classify battery degradation modes using expert weight synthesis learned from battery capacity-voltage and relaxation data. The module produces latent degradation trend embeddings, which are input to a use-dependent recurrent network for long-term degradation trajectory prediction. Validated on three typical use patterns (i.e. consistent operating histories, deeply aged batteries with unknown prior use, and uncertain second-life conditions, including 295 batteries, 93 use conditions, and 84,213 cycles), iMOE achieves an average mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 0.95% with a 0.43 ms inference time for life-long battery degradation trajectory prediction. Compared to state-of-the-art Informer and PatchTST, it reduces computational time and MAPE by 50% and 77%, respectively. Compatible with data sampling in random state of charge regions, iMOE supports a 150-cycle time-horizon degradation trajectory prediction with 1.50% and 6.26% MAPE on average and at maximum, respectively. Notably, iMOE can operate effectively even with pruned 5MB training data while retaining 0.95% MAPE. Broadly, this network offers a deployable, history-free solution for battery degradation trajectory prediction at the time of second-life deployment, redefining how second-life energy storage systems are sensed, evaluated, controlled, and integrated for sustainable energy infrastructures at scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.