Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing Arabic healthcare fake news detection with data augmentation and multi-metric analysis using large language models.

Ebtsam Mohamed, Walaa N Ismail, Eman O Eldawy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ebtsam MohamedFaculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Minia, 61511, Egypt. ebtesam.mohamed@mu.edu.eg.
Walaa N IsmailFaculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Minia, 61511, Egypt.
Eman O EldawyFaculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Minia, 61511, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of fake news about healthcare can result in a global health crisis, as it is easy to mislead the public. Detection of fake Arabic news in the healthcare sector is crucial for identifying disinformation, especially in regions where Arabic is the predominant language. Various deep learning and machine learning methods have been proposed to categorize false Arabic news related to healthcare. However, the linguistic diversity of Arabic complicates the development of effective models. Furthermore, the lack of domain-specific high-quality data makes it difficult to build accurate and reliable models. Data augmentation (DA) techniques have shown great promise in addressing these challenges. This study presents a novel technique for expanding Arabic healthcare data by conducting a multi-metric analysis to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the augmented data based on several key aspects, including label preservation, novelty, diversity, and semantic similarity. In the initial phase of our research, we investigated the impact of various data augmentation techniques on widely used classification algorithms. Additionally, similarity thresholds are systematically examined to determine their effect on the classification task. Cosine and Jaccard distances are employed to evaluate the generated sentences in terms of semantics, diversity, novelty, and label preservation. Finally, we propose a novel ensemble augmentation approach that combines multiple DA techniques to generate more varied data. Based on the overall experimental results, the proposed methodology significantly improves the classification of Arabic fake news using AraBERT, with an accuracy increase of 12.1%. In comparison, Random Forest achieved an improvement of 14.7%.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDisinformationLanguageAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningArabic Data AugmentationArabic Text GenerationContextual EmbeddingsData AugmentationFake News DetectionHealthcare MisinformationLarge Language Models (LLMs)Novelty ScoreSemantic SimilarityTransformer-based Models

Identifiers

PMID41663396
PMCPMC12886986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.