Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663391›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Cellulose nanofibers and limestone filler enable high-performance, sustainable, and cost-efficient printable concrete.

Yu Wang, Ala Eddin Douba, Naveenkumar Rajendiran, David L Cubillos-Gamez, Akshat Verma, Richard D Bergman, Troy Runge, Jan Olek, Pablo D Zavattieri, Jeffrey P Youngblood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu WangLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Ala Eddin DoubaLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Naveenkumar RajendiranBiological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
David L Cubillos-GamezLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Akshat VermaSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Richard D BergmanForest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-1717
Troy RungeBiological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4389-609X
Jan OlekLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-9877
Pablo D ZavattieriLyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-150X
Jeffrey P YoungbloodSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. jpyoungb@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-8642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D-printed concrete requires carefully tuned rheological properties to ensure successful printing. Achieving a balance between printability, mechanical performance, sustainability and cost remains a challenge due to high cement content and extensive use of chemical admixtures typically required to meet rheological constraints. In this study, we develop a high-performance, low-carbon, cost-effective printable concrete using cellulose nanofibers and limestone filler. Incorporation of 0.3% cellulose nanofibers with 29% limestone filler replacement increases the static yield stress, storage modulus, and critical strain by 1213%, 255%, and 542%, respectively, with a moderate impact on viscosity compared to the reference mixture. Microstructural analyses indicate that the limestone filler accelerates hydration and enhances early-age stiffening, while the cellulose nanofibers increase static yield stress through colloidal interactions. Cellulose nanofibers enhance both compressive and flexural strength, allowing up to a 40% reduction in cement content while maintaining mechanical performance. Robotic 3D printing of a large-scale element demonstrates the scalability of the developed mixture and underscores its potential for large scale applications. Finally, techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment further demonstrate the environmental and economic benefits of the proposed mixtures.

Identifiers

PMID41663391
PMCPMC13079892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.