ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026
Dual psychometric evaluation of measures assessing attitudes toward prenatal alcohol exposure and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual psychometric evaluation of measures assessing attitudes toward prenatal alcohol exposure and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUninformed attitudes toward prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) remain barriers in the assessment and diagnosis of affected individuals. While there is a growing need to evaluate the attitudes of professionals who work closely with pregnant individuals and those living with FASD, it is currently unknown whether existing psychometric tools, quantifying such attitudes, are reliable. The psychometric properties of two measures were therefore investigated: the "Alcohol and Pregnancy Measure" (capturing attitudes toward PAE) and the "Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding FASD Measure" (capturing attitudes toward FASD).
methodsA total of 1797 healthcare workers, recruited largely from the National Health Service in Scotland, completed both psychometric measures as part of a nationwide survey of attitudes. Participants also completed novel measurements of their knowledge of FASD and their attitudes toward the health advice for pregnant women regarding alcohol use during pregnancy.
resultsSupport for the psychometric validity of the two measures was partially observed. Both measures were found to have multifactor structures, instead of the hypothesised one-factor solutions. Such multifactor structures demonstrated goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analyses. Moreover, both measures showed convergent validity with both knowledge of FASD and attitudes toward current health advice regarding PAE. Both the measures' sensitivity to ceiling effects and poor subfactor internal consistencies, however, remain a concern.
conclusionResults indicate that both measures, when used at the total-scale level, can acceptably assess attitudes toward PAE and FASD. Revisions are required at the item-level to further improve subfactor internal consistency and minimize ceiling effect likelihood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.