ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
High-resolution cortical mapping within and across the central sulcus using 1024-electrode micro-electrocorticography arrays: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral sulcus identification using phase reversal on electrocorticography (ECoG) is a critical tool for neurosurgical intervention around the primary motor and somatosensory cortices. This mapping is typically performed using cortical arrays with a resolution of several millimeters. OBSERVATIONS: A 30-year-old female underwent a right frontoparietal craniotomy for resection of a 4-cm contrast-enhancing lesion within the central sulcus. Central sulcus localization was performed using a standard ECoG array. High-resolution micro-ECoG (µECoG) arrays were then placed over the pre- and postcentral gyri, giving 2048-electrode recordings across the central sulcus. Combining this high-resolution µECoG with an augmented reality imaging overlay to identify the tumor, the central sulcus was split, revealing the underlying tumor. A safe, gross-total resection was obtained with no postoperative complications. Through the use of µECoG arrays spanning into the central sulcus, a high-resolution phase-reversal contour was identified across the central sulcus. LESSONS: The authors demonstrate the feasibility and utility of µECoG for sensorimotor mapping within the central sulcus, revealing a phase reversal at a resolution of approximately 400 microns. Compared to standard mapping, which records gyral surface electrophysiology, they further demonstrate phase-reversal electrophysiology within a dissected central sulcus. High-resolution cortical mapping from µECoG may foster several neurosurgical advancements, from tumor resection to brain-computer interfaces. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25534.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.