ArticleJMIR AI2026
Performance of 5 AI Models on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Questions: Comparative Observational Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Four Core Medical School Courses: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly being used in medical education. Although models like ChatGPT have previously demonstrated strong performance on United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)-style questions, newer AI tools with enhanced capabilities are now available, necessitating comparative evaluations of their accuracy and reliability across different medical domains and question formats.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of 5 publicly available AI models: Grok, ChatGPT-4, Copilot, Gemini, and DeepSeek, on the USMLE Step 1 free 120-question set, assessing their accuracy and consistency across question types and medical subjects.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted between February 10 and March 5, 2025. Each of the 119 USMLE-style questions (excluding 1 audio-based item) was presented to each AI model by using a standardized prompt cycle. Models answered each question 3 times to assess confidence and consistency. Questions were categorized as text-based or image-based and as case-based or information-based. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with Bonferroni adjustment for pairwise comparisons.
resultsGrok achieved the highest score (109/119, 91.6%), followed by Copilot (101/119, 84.9%), Gemini (100/119, 84%), ChatGPT-4 (95/119, 79.8%), and DeepSeek (86/119, 72.3%). DeepSeek's lower score was due to an inability to process visual media, resulting in 0% accuracy on image-based items. When limited to text-only questions (n=96), DeepSeek's accuracy increased to 89.6% (86/96), matching Copilot. Grok showed the highest accuracy on image-based (21/23, 91.3%) and case-based questions (70/78, 89.7%), with statistically significant differences observed between Grok and DeepSeek on case-based items (P=.01). The models performed best in biostatistics and epidemiology (5.8/6, 96.7%) and worst in musculoskeletal, skin, and connective tissue (4.4/7, 62.9%). Grok maintained 100% consistency in responses, while Copilot demonstrated the most self-correction (112/119, 94.1% consistency), improving its accuracy to 89.9% (107/119) on the third attempt.
conclusionsAI models showed varying strengths across domains, with Grok demonstrating the highest accuracy and consistency in this dataset, particularly for image-based and reasoning-heavy questions. Although ChatGPT-4 remains widely used, newer models like Grok and Copilot also performed competitively. Continuous evaluation is essential as AI tools rapidly evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.