ArticleThe Journal of urology2026
Low Testosterone Levels and Grade Group Progression Among Localized Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeActive surveillance (AS) is an increasingly used strategy for managing localized prostate cancer, yet reliable biomarkers for predicting disease progression remain limited. Low testosterone has been associated with aggressive prostate cancer features at diagnosis, but its role in Grade Group (GG) progression during AS remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association between baseline serum testosterone levels and GG progression in men undergoing AS for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 924 men enrolled in an AS program between 2005 and 2024, with a median follow-up of 46.1 months among those who did not progress. Serum testosterone levels were categorized as low if they met a threshold of ≤ 300 ng/dL based on guideline recommendations. Primary outcomes were biopsy progression to GG2 or "extreme" progression to GG3 or higher disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between testosterone levels and progression, adjusting for age, PSA density, and biopsy tumor volume. Potential clinically significant confounding by BMI, smoking status, and ethnicity was also considered.
resultsAmong 924 men, the mean age was 63.6 years (SD 8.1), and the mean PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL
conclusionsThese findings suggest that while low testosterone is not clearly associated with moderate progression (GG2), it may increase the risk of higher-grade "extreme" progression to GG3 or higher. Future studies should focus on prospective validation of our findings to elucidate the biological relationship between androgens and prostate cancer progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.