Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662499›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Cohort-Scale Spatial Autocorrelation for Tumor Prediction in Mid-Infrared Pathology and Spatial Biomarker Discovery Using MALDI Imaging Lipidomics.

Miriam F Rittel, Nikolas Ebert, Denis Abu Sammour, Sebastian Graf, Björn C Fröhlich, Emrullah Birgin, Shad A Mohammed, Nuh N Rahbari, Axel Wellmann, Oliver Wasenmüller and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Miriam F RittelCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-8842
Nikolas EbertCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Intelligent Systems, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2971-1012
Denis Abu SammourCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-6854
Sebastian GrafInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Björn C FröhlichCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Emrullah BirginDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0338-3727
Shad A MohammedCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-8718
Nuh N RahbariDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-9039
Axel WellmannInstitute of Pathology, Celle, Germany.
Oliver WasenmüllerCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Intelligent Systems, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Cleo-Aron WeisInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1831-3406
Stefan SchmidtCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-3290
Carsten HopfCeMOS Research and Transfer Center, Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Technische Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0802-6451

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 262133997Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 410981386German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0388B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mid-infrared (MIR) imaging is an emerging label-free modality for classifying tissue types, including viable tumor in highly heterogeneous cancers, by assessing spatial differences in chemical composition. However, common data analysis neglects spatial vicinity and relies on time-consuming pathological insight for hotspot prediction of viable tumor areas and computational tissue type annotation. Here, we present a method that uses spatial autocorrelation on MIR projection images computed from data of selected wavenumbers found by random forest ranking for computational tissue type annotation: Interdependent data processing enabled high accuracy annotations, whereas referencing of sequentially added new samples to a hyperspectral tissue database ensured computational efficiency and scalability for larger cohorts. Applied to clinical colorectal cancer liver metastasis samples, the method matched manual pathology assessment in a double-blind study. As an option, MIR-based hotspots can be correlated with mass spectrometry imaging. This multimodal approach identified sphingomyelin isoforms as lipidomic tumor marker candidates by imaging parallel reaction monitoring-parallel accumulation serial fragmentation (iprm-PASEF) directly on tissue. Taken together, spatial autocorrelation analysis on MIR imaging data could improve automated accurate annotation of tissue morphologies of heterogeneous cancer specimens and support the discovery of spatial cancer biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsLipidomicsLiver NeoplasmsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationHumansBiomarkers, Tumorcolorectal cancer liver metastasisMALDI imagingmass spectrometry imagingmid‐infrared imagingmultimodal correlative imagingspatial autocorrelation

Identifiers

PMID41662499
PMCPMC13115961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.