Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662460›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Emotion meets coordination: Designing multi-agent LLMs for fine-grained user sentiment detection on social media.

Hao Dong, Zuowen Bao, Muze Li, Zhengfeng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao DongDepartment of Digital Media Art, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zuowen BaoDepartment of Design, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Muze LiDepartment of Visual Design, Hanyang University, Ansan, South Korea.
Zhengfeng YangDepartment of Visual Design, Hanyang University, Ansan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9689-3404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media platforms have become central channels for emotional communication, posing new challenges for fine-grained sentiment analysis due to their high contextual variability, multimodal content, and pervasive ambiguity. Traditional end-to-end sentiment models often struggle to capture compositional or conflicting emotional cues in user-generated texts. This study presents a modular multi-agent architecture for sentiment analysis, implemented with the LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct model and guided by system-level design principles. The framework decomposes emotion inference into three coordinated stages, perception, reasoning, and resolution, each managed by a specialized agent trained with parameter-efficient tuning strategies. A meta-agent mediates conflicting predictions through a coordination protocol based on confidence estimation and discourse consistency, enabling adaptive consensus formation. Evaluations on the GoEmotions v2, SemEval-2024, and Twitter benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed system achieves higher accuracy, robustness, and interpretability compared with existing baselines. These findings indicate that architectural decomposition combined with collaborative reasoning enhances reliability and transparency in sentiment analysis, offering a scalable pathway toward intelligent and emotionally aware computational systems.

Indexed as

EmotionsSocial MediaAlgorithmsHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41662460
PMCPMC12885380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.