Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662408›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Interpretable ensemble machine learning framework for cardiovascular disease prediction using EMR data and large language models in Ethiopia.

Alemu Kumilachew Tegegnie, Kibrom Tewolde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alemu Kumilachew TegegnieFaculty of Computing, Bahir Dar University Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-3647
Kibrom TewoldeFaculty of Computing, Bahir Dar University Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally, with a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries such as Ethiopia. Early detection is limited by resource constraints, low screening uptake, and a lack of predictive tools tailored to local healthcare systems. This study presents an interpretable ensemble machine learning framework for predicting CVD risk via structured electronic medical record (EMR) data from public hospitals in Addis Ababa. We trained an XGBoost classifier on 20,960 anonymized records containing demographic, clinical, and physiological attributes. Preprocessing involves handling missing values, outlier capping, one-hot encoding, rare-category grouping, and dimensionality reduction. SHapley additive explanations (SHAPs) were used for feature attribution, and a large language model (Gemini) was used to translate SHAP outputs into plain-language narratives to enhance interpretability. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.99, with strong precision (0.99), recall (0.98), and F1-scores across both classes. SHAP analysis identified general_plan, history of present illness (HPI), musculoskeletal system (MSS) and diagnosis as key predictors. The integration of SHAP and LLMs provided transparent, clinician-friendly insights into model outputs, supporting adoption in resource-limited settings. This study demonstrates that combining ensemble learning with explainability techniques can yield highly accurate and interpretable CVD prediction models, offering potential for integration into clinical decision-support systems in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

Boosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41662408
PMCPMC12885298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.