ArticlePloS one2026
Interpretable ensemble machine learning framework for cardiovascular disease prediction using EMR data and large language models in Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global burden of varicella in children aged 5-9 y, relationship with vaccination policy indicators, and projected trends to 2030.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally, with a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries such as Ethiopia. Early detection is limited by resource constraints, low screening uptake, and a lack of predictive tools tailored to local healthcare systems. This study presents an interpretable ensemble machine learning framework for predicting CVD risk via structured electronic medical record (EMR) data from public hospitals in Addis Ababa. We trained an XGBoost classifier on 20,960 anonymized records containing demographic, clinical, and physiological attributes. Preprocessing involves handling missing values, outlier capping, one-hot encoding, rare-category grouping, and dimensionality reduction. SHapley additive explanations (SHAPs) were used for feature attribution, and a large language model (Gemini) was used to translate SHAP outputs into plain-language narratives to enhance interpretability. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.99, with strong precision (0.99), recall (0.98), and F1-scores across both classes. SHAP analysis identified general_plan, history of present illness (HPI), musculoskeletal system (MSS) and diagnosis as key predictors. The integration of SHAP and LLMs provided transparent, clinician-friendly insights into model outputs, supporting adoption in resource-limited settings. This study demonstrates that combining ensemble learning with explainability techniques can yield highly accurate and interpretable CVD prediction models, offering potential for integration into clinical decision-support systems in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.