Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662391›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A new method of off-site inverse carbon accounting and its application in agriculture carbon measurement.

Hui Shen, Yue Liu, Boyan Zou, Kaodui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui ShenSchool of Teacher Education, JiangSu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yue LiuSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-2366
Boyan ZouDepartment of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4480-8062
Kaodui LiSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research introduces an innovative agricultural carbon accounting approach for straw burning that combines stochastic process modeling with LSTM neural networks. Traditional methods face limitations including high uncertainty, fragmented data, and prohibitive real-time monitoring costs. Our off-site inverse carbon accounting methodology employs three-dimensional Brownian motion to simulate carbon molecular diffusion patterns, incorporating horizontally drifted motion influenced by wind speed and vertically truncated motion dominated by thermal activity. The framework utilizes LSTM-based time-series predictions to generate virtual diffusion path samples for dynamic model calibration. By quantifying the probability density function of carbon molecular diffusion, we inversely derive carbon emission rates from particle arrival probabilities at observation points. Validation through a straw-burning case demonstrates an average carbon emission rate of 0.0049 tons/second with error margins below 10%, confirming the method's accuracy. This approach overcomes limitations of traditional emission factor methods while providing cost-effective real-time carbon monitoring for agricultural contexts. Future research could integrate multi-physics models, remote sensing data, and advanced computational techniques like quantum computing to enhance scalability and precision. This work establishes a foundation for data-driven carbon governance in agricultural supply chains, supporting global carbon neutrality efforts.

Indexed as

AgricultureCarbonEnvironmental MonitoringLong Short Term MemoryStochastic ProcessesCarbon

Identifiers

PMID41662391
PMCPMC12885257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.