Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662374›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Enhanced extractive text summarization framework for low-resourced Urdu language.

Shahzad Nazir, Muhammad Asif, Shahbaz Ahmad, Hanan Aljuaid, Shahbaz Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahzad NazirDepartment of CS & IT, Baba Guru Nanak University, Nankana Sahib, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad AsifDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-2527
Shahbaz AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Hanan AljuaidComputer Sciences Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shahbaz AhmadFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This era has witnessed an enormous increase in textual corpus available in digital form. Therefore, an intelligent mechanism is required to extract the essential information. This task is performed using an automatic text summarization that converts the text into a shorter form while the semantics are preserved. The popular languages of the world such as English, Chinese etc. have well-developed text summarization models. However, for low-resourced languages such as Urdu, well-established methods are missing. This research work proposes improved supervised and unsupervised extractive text summarization models. A large-scale dataset containing text documents and their human-annotated extractive summaries has been created. In the supervised approach, fifteen features are extracted against each sentence in the text. Further, to reduce the computational complexity, feature reduction is performed. Multiple machine learning and deep learning models are employed, including the proposed model. In an unsupervised approach, four different models are utilized. Further, the high results-producing model is incorporated with the top three features that significantly contributed to the supervised approach. The results are evaluated using ROUGE scores. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed supervised and unsupervised approaches outperform existing Urdu text summarization methods, achieving approximately 7% and 12% improvements in ROUGE scores, respectively.

Indexed as

Data MiningLanguageNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID41662374
PMCPMC12885249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.