ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Early individualized risk prediction using clinical data for children during the febrile phase of dengue in outpatient settings in Vietnam and Thailand.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tree-Based Machine Learning for Diagnostic Classification of Dengue Fever Using Routine Hematological Parameters: A Secondary Analysis of a Publicly Available Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue severity prediction models are usually developed using hospitalized patient data, but triage and hospital admission are mainly evaluated in outpatient settings. This study developed models using clinical and laboratory data from patients in outpatient settings during the febrile phase. Data from two cohort studies in Vietnam and Thailand were used to develop and validate six models: logistic regression with warning signs, Lasso-selected logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosted classification, support vector machine, and artificial neural network. Models predicted dengue shock syndrome (DSS) as the primary endpoint and moderate plasma leakage and/or DSS as the secondary endpoint. We assessed model performance, discrimination, and calibration, using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Brier score, AUROC, CITL, calibration slope, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The optimal model was the Lasso-selected logistic regression for predicting DSS and the combined endpoint of moderate plasma leakage and/or DSS (Brier score: 0.044 [95% CI 0.043, 0.044] and 0.104 [95% CI 0.104, 0.105]; AUROC: 0.789 [95% CI 0.787, 0.791] and 0.741 [95% CI 0.740, 0.742]). We identified hematocrit, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and aspartate aminotransferase as predictors for DSS, and abdominal pain or tenderness, vomiting, mucosal bleeding, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum albumin as predictors for the secondary endpoint. Logistic regression and machine learning models using clinical and laboratory data during the febrile phase can support early prediction of severe disease in outpatient settings. Integrating risk prediction models into a decision support system could improve triage and optimize healthcare and resource allocation in endemic and resource-limited areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.