ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The catastrophic financial burden of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and asset index-based inequality analysis: A prospective cohort study analysing patients' impoverishment.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences and understanding of diagnosis and treatment among drug-resistant extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients: A qualitative study from Central India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective cohort study assessed the financial burden of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in India, revealing substantial costs across disease manifestations. Among 200 confirmed EPTB patients, those with pleuritis, meningitis, and other severe forms, incurred significantly higher out-of-pocket (OOP) and indirect costs than lymphadenitis patients. Over 90% of meningitis and 80% of pleuritis patients experienced catastrophic health expenditures (CHE), defined as costs exceeding 20% of annual income. Up to 42% of patients were pushed below the poverty line. Asset-based inequality analysis showed that lower socioeconomic groups faced a disproportionate cost burden. The cost of diagnostic tests and the less severe nature of EPTB lymphadenitis may delay seeking care until patients' ability to work is affected. Factors such as low income, comorbidities, diagnostic delays, and reduced working capacity were associated with CHE. Notably, presumptive non-TB patients also incurred significant OOP and productivity losses during their diagnostic journeys, despite ultimately receiving non-TB diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for universal health coverage and enhanced financial protection strategies to mitigate the economic impact of EPTB and similar chronic conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.