Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Establishing a filarial clinical research platform in a resource-limited setting: Lessons and experiences from Tanzania.
Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Establishing a filarial clinical research platform in a resource-limited setting: Lessons and experiences from Tanzania.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the establishment and lessons learned from the LeDoxy Trial, a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that evaluated doxycycline (200 mg/d and 100 mg/d) over six weeks for the treatment of filarial lymphedema in Tanzania's Lindi and Pwani regions. Conducted from 2018 to 2021 across four sites, the trial enrolled 420 participants aged 14-65 years, addressing a critical gap in lymphatic filariasis (LF) research in geographically remote and historically under-researched areas. The trial faced significant challenges, including limited pre-existing research infrastructure, community research fatigue, and disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, which delayed regulatory approvals and supply chains. To overcome these, the TAKeOFF Consortium with Tanzania's National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) as local sponsor led a 12-month site preparation effort, upgrading Lindi's laboratory from a 2-star to a 4-star rating through infrastructure enhancements (e.g., centrifuges, freezers) and staff training in Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP). Community health workers (CHWs) leveraging established community-directed approaches from NTD control programs played a pivotal role, achieving a 92% retention rate through targeted recruitment, door-to-door engagement, and follow-up support, including the distribution of hygiene kits. The trial trained 93 healthcare professionals in LF management and clinical research, fostering a research culture despite initial resistance. Additional strategies included remote monitoring to adapt to travel restrictions and stakeholder collaboration to address cultural misconceptions, such as stigma around LF. These efforts not only ensured trial success but also created foundational capacity that has begun to support post-trial research activities, with ongoing evaluation needed to assess long-term sustainability. This paper provides comprehensive, integrated documentation of the infrastructure development process from laboratory accreditation and regulatory navigation to community engagement and sustainability planning, offering actionable guidance for conducting high-quality NTD trials in resource-limited settings. The lessons emphasizing local sponsorship, adaptive protocols, and community trust demonstrate how strategic investments in research infrastructure, local capacity-building, and stakeholder engagement can strengthen clinical research ecosystems in LMICs, advancing health systems, local ownership, and global health equity. This paper focuses exclusively on the operational and implementation aspects of establishing the trial infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.