ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Transfer learning-based two-sample Mendelian randomization method for heterogeneous population.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population heterogeneity presents a significant challenge for two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), often leading to biased estimates of causal effects. This heterogeneity arises when covariate distributions differ across populations, especially when these covariates function both as confounders and effect modifiers. To address this issue, we propose a new method, transfer learning-based Mendelian randomization (TLMR) that leverages observable effect modifiers to transfer predicted exposures from a source population to a target population. This transfer enables causal effect estimation in the target population while properly accounting for population differences. TLMR is developed under minimal modeling assumptions, allowing flexible exposure modeling, and supporting both continuous and binary outcomes. We further extend TLMR to accommodate reverse transfer in the outcome model that broadens its applicability in practical settings. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that TLMR yields robust and consistent estimates in heterogeneous populations, outperforming eight widely used MR methods that exhibit substantial estimation bias. Even in homogeneous populations or in the absence of effect modification, TLMR performs comparably to existing approaches. Finally, we systematically evaluate the causal relationship between body mass index and pulmonary function, demonstrating the practical utility and improved accuracy of TLMR in real-world analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.