ArticleCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Early Prediction of Adverse Stroke Outcomes Using Nonclinical Factors and Missing Data: A Machine Learning Study.
Article in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly prediction of stroke outcomes using prognostic tools may help clinical decision-making and inform resource allocation. However, clinical information required to inform prediction tools is often missing. We evaluated the performance of machine learning (ML) prediction models of adverse stroke outcome at 90 days post-admission that exploit non-clinical data, and missingness, alongside traditional clinical and demographic predictors.
methodsWe used routine hospital data from UK clinical sites (NHS SafeHaven) to train three gradient-boosted models. We compared baseline clinical features with nonclinical features and missingness to predict a composite 90-day adverse stroke outcome: mortality, stroke recurrence, or new care-home discharge. Model validation used 10% of the data. Model performance was evaluated by accuracy (correct predictions/total predictions) and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) while DeLong's test was used to compare performance of the three models. We used Brier score to evaluate model calibration. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses determined the contribution of each model feature in predicting adverse stroke outcome.
resultsThe final sample included 3,530 stroke patients with 51% males (mean age = 72 years; SD = 14). Clinical data were incomplete with five clinical features having >63% missing values. The performance of the three models was not significantly different (p = 0.5-0.9). The model with non-clinical and missingness features demonstrated 71% accuracy and AUC of 0.76 with Brier score of 0.19. Nonclinical factors, such as time to clinical assessment and time to admission, were among the five most important predictors of adverse stroke outcome (mean |SHAP| = 0.03 and 0.05), alongside Glasgow Coma Scale (0.08), age (0.03), and temperature (0.02). Missing clinical values (pulse and LDL) predicted adverse stroke outcome (mean |SHAP| = 0.02 and 0.02) and were correlated with age (ρ = 0.2), arrival by ambulance (ρ = 0.3), length of stay (ρ = -0.3), and transient ischaemic attack (ρ = 0.3).
conclusionWe demonstrate that nonclinical factors and missingness of data can assist in early predictions of 90-day adverse stroke outcomes. As these factors are often well documented in electronic health systems, they could complement or supplement traditional clinical predictive factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.