Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Voices from the emergency department: A theoretical framework analysis on patient experiences of care in emergency departments of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Aswathy Geetha Manukumar, Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki, Holly Etchegary, Anna Walsh, Oliver Hurley, Christopher Patey, Paul Norman, Shabnam Asghari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aswathy Geetha ManukumarCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2915-9143
Nahid Rahimipour AnarakiCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Holly EtchegaryNLSUPPORT, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Anna WalshCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Oliver HurleyCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Christopher PateyDiscipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-2193
Paul NormanNewfoundland and Labrador Health Services, Carbonear Institute for Rural Reach and Innovation by the Sea, Carbonear General Hospital, Carbonear, Canada.
Shabnam AsghariCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience in the emergency department (ED) encompasses different aspects of care, such as respect, communication, timeliness, shared decision-making, and care transition. The inherently stressful ED environment presents additional challenges for providers in ensuring a positive patient experience. Studying patient experience allows health systems to recognize areas of care that need improvement and introduce strategies to improve patient-centred care.

objectivesTo explore the patient experience of emergency department care in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada.

methodsThis qualitative study collected data from patients who visited two urban and two rural EDs in NL via telephone surveys and semi-structured interviews. Five researchers used a theoretical framework, symbolic interactionism, to analyze open-ended survey responses and semi-structured interviews. Patient research partners were consulted to ensure the themes reflected their lived experiences.

resultsA total of 836 responses were analyzed (831 survey responses, five semi-structured interviews), leading to six key themes on patient experience. They are: (1) Mutual respect and trust in providers, (2) Timeliness of care, (3) Communication, (4) Comfort and accommodations, (5) Information sharing and decision-making, and (6) Continuity of care.

conclusionOur findings show an immediate need to improve the patient experience of ED care and highlight areas within these themes that could be targeted for improvement. We recommend regular training programs for healthcare providers to improve their interpersonal skills, the addition of patient navigators, and modifications to the triage system for vulnerable populations to improve patient experience and provide patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionQuality ImprovementAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41662293
PMCPMC12885285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.