Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662274›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Choosing the best route: Comparative optimization of wheat transformation methods for improving yield by targeting TaARE1-D with CRISPR/Cas9.

Mumin Ibrahim Tek, Kubra Budak Tek, Pelin Sarikaya, Abdul Razak Ahmed, Hakan Fidan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mumin Ibrahim TekDépartement de Phytologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-1626
Kubra Budak TekDépartement de Phytologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Pelin SarikayaPlant Protection Department, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Abdul Razak AhmedPlant Protection Department, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Hakan FidanPlant Protection Department, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-9486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important crops worldwide, supplying a major share of calories and protein for the global population. Incorporating gene editing into breeding programs is critical to improve yield and stress tolerance, yet wheat remains difficult to transform and regenerate efficiently. These bottlenecks limit the full application of CRISPR/Cas9 for improvement yield in wheat. To address this, transformation parameters were optimized for three methods: immature embryo transformation, callus transformation, and injection-based in planta transformation. Systematic optimization of Agrobacterium strain, bacterial density, acetosyringone concentration, and incubation conditions resulted in substantially improved transformation success. Efficiencies of 66.84% for immature embryos, 55.44% for callus, and 33.33% for in planta transformation were achieved, representing more than tenfold increase compared with previously reported rate of ~3%. A key innovation was the shortening of the callus induction stage for immature embryos, reducing the time required for plant regeneration by approximately one month while maintaining high transformation efficiency. The protocols were validated through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of TaARE1-D, a negative regulator of nitrogen uptake and yield. Generated mutants exhibited increased grain number, spike length, grain length, and thousand-grain weight, as well as the characteristic stay-green phenotype associated with loss of TaARE1-D function. The optimized protocols provide robust platforms to accelerate gene-editing in wheat to increase yield and stress-tolerance.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPlant ProteinsTransformation, GeneticTriticumPlants, Genetically ModifiedSeedsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41662274
PMCPMC12885284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.