ArticlePloS one2026
Patients' and relatives' perspectives on the quality of end-of-Life care in advanced cancer: From the final months to bereavement.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life care affects both patients with advanced cancer and their relatives but is often assessed from only one perspective, namely that of bereaved relatives. This study aimed to gain insight into the quality of care as experienced by patients with advanced cancer and their relatives.
methodsA total of 367 patients with stage IV cancer, 242 relatives and 163 bereaved relatives were included from a large prospective, longitudinal study (eQuiPe), which ran from November 2017 until March 2020. Patients and their relatives completed a questionnaire during the last 3 months of the patient's life. Bereaved relatives completed a questionnaire within six months after the patient's death.
resultsAt the end of life, patients reported a mean satisfaction with care score of 72/100 (SD 21), and relatives a mean score of 59/100 (SD 28) for the care they received themselves. Continuity with care, the extent to which the care received from different healthcare professionals was coordinated, was associated with higher satisfaction with care in patients (β 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.6). Bereaved relatives reported that most patients died peacefully (87%) and at home (73%). Most bereaved relatives (66%) were contacted by a healthcare professional after the patient's death, but over half were not informed about grief (52%) or the available options for bereavement support (58%), with about 20% reporting they would have appreciated this.
conclusionsQuality of end-of-life care was generally perceived as good. This study highlights the importance of good continuity of care as it is associated with higher satisfaction with care in patients. Also, one-fifth of the bereaved relatives reported that they had not been informed about bereavement care despite desiring it, which emphasizes the need for better care for relatives before and after the patient's death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.