Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662267›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Regional disparities in subjective wellbeing across Europe: A fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach.

Alessandro Indelicato, Juan Carlos Martín, Vincenzo Marinello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alessandro IndelicatoDepartment of Analysis of Applied Economics, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-4333
Juan Carlos MartínDepartment of Analysis of Applied Economics, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-2405
Vincenzo MarinelloDepartment of Economic and legal sciences, University of Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study analyses differences in subjective well-being (SWB) across European regions. Through the Fuzzy-Hybrid TOPSIS approach, we analyse SWB at the country and regional levels. Additionally, a quantile regression model is employed to investigate the impact of socio-economic factors on SWB. The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) dataset from 2017 is used for seven countries: Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Finland, Hungary and Slovenia. The synthetic indicator is derived from four indicators: happiness, life satisfaction, goal achievement, and family pressure. At the country level, Germany achieves the highest SWB score (0.69), while Hungary records the lowest (0.51). Regional analysis shows German regions (particularly Saarland and Schleswig-Holstein) and Spanish regions (notably La Rioja and Baleares) occupy top positions in the SWB rankings. Quantile regression results confirm that age, education level, and income significantly influence SWB, with older individuals, those with intermediate education levels, and higher-income earners showing consistently higher SWB values.

Indexed as

Psychological Well-BeingEuropeFuzzy LogicHappinessHumansIncomePersonal SatisfactionSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41662267
PMCPMC12885272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.