Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662255›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Rapid detection of the beech leaf nematode, Litylenchus crenatae using recombinase polymerase amplification assay with lateral flow dipsticks.

Mihail Kantor, Sergei A Subbotin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mihail KantorPlant Pathology & Environmental Microbiology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-104X
Sergei A SubbotinPlant Pest Diagnostic Center, California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beech leaf nematode, Litylenchus crenatae, is the causal agent of beech leaf disease (BLD), a condition characterized by interveinal dark-green banding, leaf thickening, bud abortion, and potentially tree mortality. Current identification methods for L. crenatae rely on morphometric analysis or molecular techniques such as conventional PCR and real-time PCR. To support timely management of BLD, there is a need for a rapid, field-deployable detection method. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a new isothermal in vitro nucleic acid amplification technique that has been adopted for rapid and reliable diagnostics of nematodes. In this study, RPA assay combined with lateral flow (LF) dipsticks has been developed targeting the ITS rRNA gene of L. crenatae. The assay demonstrated high specificity, sensitivity, enabling direct detection from crude nematode extracts and from DNA leaf plant extracts. Assay specificity was validated against a range of non-target nematode species. The LF-RPA assay showed reliable detection within 28-30 min with a sensitivity of 0.002 nematode per reaction tube for crude nematode extracts or 0.03 nematode per reaction tube using DNA extracts from leaves. The LF-RPA assay presents a practical diagnostic tool for plant clinics and forestry professionals, enabling rapid on-site detection of L. crenatae in infested beech trees to support timely disease management decisions.

Indexed as

FagusNematodaNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesRecombinasesAnimalsDNA, HelminthRapid Diagnostic TestsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, HelminthRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID41662255
PMCPMC12885296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.