ArticlePloS one2026
Calibration of discrete element parameters for cohesive soils at different moisture contents.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To obtain discrete element method simulation parameters for cohesive soil during the scrapping process of loaders, this paper calibrates parameters of cohesive soil with different moisture contents based on the Hertz-Mindlin with Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) Cohesion contact model in Experts in Discrete Element Modeling (EDEM). First, five cohesive soil samples with different moisture contents were prepared. By combining vibration sieving, the inclined plane method, and angle of repose experiments, the measured data ranges of particle size distribution, soil-steel friction coefficient, and angle of repose were obtained. Secondly, the JKR V2 adhesion model was constructed in EDEM. Significant parameters were screened using the Plackett-Burman test. Finally, the response surface analysis range was determined by integrating climbing experiments, and a quadratic regression model was established through Box-Behnken design to optimize parameter combinations. Furthermore, a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm was introduced for single-objective optimization of the angle of repose. The experimental results show that with the increase of moisture content, the angle of repose increases from 30.83° to 37.13°, and the significant parameters are JKR surface energy, soil-soil restitution coefficient, and static friction coefficient. The simulation error of the PSO algorithm is reduced from the maximum 3.38% in the response surface method to within 2.2%. This study provides a high-precision parameterization method for DEM modeling of cohesive soil, offering references for establishing DEM simulations of loaders scraping cohesive soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.