ReviewPLOS mental health2025
Intact but vulnerable: Affective working memory in social anxiety disorder.
Review in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cyber-victimized and cognitively fogged? Cyberbullying victimization and executive function.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is increasingly recognized as a disorder of cognitive-affective dysregulation, with growing evidence implicating affective working memory (AWM) as a core mechanism. This narrative review synthesizes findings from behavioral, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging studies to examine how socially and emotionally salient stimuli interfere with working memory (WM) processes in individuals with SAD. While general WM capacity often appears intact in neutral contexts, impairments emerge consistently when tasks involve socially threatening content or require executive control under cognitive load. Key disruptions include reduced flexibility, impaired updating, and sustained attentional capture by threat. These deficits are further moderated by individual symptom dimensions and task demands. The review critically evaluates current theoretical models and highlights methodological limitations in the field, proposing directions for future research. Clinical implications include the use of AWM-sensitive assessments and interventions that target executive regulation of emotion. AWM thus provides a mechanistic bridge linking cognition, emotion, and social dysfunction in SAD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.