ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Coverage of suicide deaths in newspapers and perceptions of suicide loss survivors on reporting: Insights from a community survey in India.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited research explores newspaper coverage of suicide deaths, and its impact on suicide loss survivors. An exploratory inquiry study examined newspaper coverage of suicide deaths and how families perceived this reporting of suicide deaths within their family in India. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with suicide loss survivors, an adult member most knowledgeable about the suicide, for 155 suicide deaths in three Indian states - Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. Newspaper coverage by socio-demography of the deceased, and support and opposition by the survivors for the newspaper reporting and their reasons for it are reported. Among all suicide deaths, 39.4% (95% CI: 31.9-47.3%) were reported in newspaper for both sexes combined, 37.8% for males and 43.2% for females, which varied by socio-demography of the deceased. Deaths registered with the police were 4.5 times more likely to be reported. For the 61 cases reported in newspaper, 49.2% survivors opposed the coverage, 31.1% supported it, and 19.7% declined to respond. The support for reporting of male suicide deaths was significantly associated with increasing levels of education of the survivor. No specific pattern was seen for female suicide deaths for supporting or opposing the reporting. Support was mainly to raise awareness about suicide (73.4%), including general awareness about suicide, implications of death, and about farmers' suicides. Majority of the survivors opposing the coverage did not provide a specific reason for it. Implications of reading about the suicide death in newspaper varied by the socio-demography of the deceased and of the survivors, highlighting the complexity of suicide bereavement and that it needs to be understood further within the local socio-cultural context. These insights from families can inform refinements to existing media codes, ensuring that they address the needs of survivors, promote greater sensitivity in coverage, and equip reporters with practical approaches to minimize harm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.