Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662107›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

From mental health detention to health systems reform: Co-producing policy and practice recommendations with Black men, their communities, and health and social care professionals.

Elaine Craig, Caroline Leah, Jeremy Dixon, Anna Bergqvist, Isaiah Brodrick, Debbie Best, Kim Heyes, Joy Duxbury, Alina Haines-Delmont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elaine CraigSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-3956
Caroline LeahDepartment of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-7848
Jeremy DixonCentre for Adult Social Care Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Anna BergqvistResearch Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Cumbria, United Kingdom.
Isaiah BrodrickSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Debbie BestResearch Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Cumbria, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1845-0229
Kim HeyesSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-545X
Joy DuxburyResearch Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Cumbria, United Kingdom.
Alina Haines-DelmontDepartment of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"I can't breathe," is the phrase that has come to symbolise broad forms of systemic suffocation experienced by Black communities within mental health systems. Positioning Black men, within the context of health and social dynamics, involves understanding the unique systemic barriers they face. Using mental health detention as the entry point to explore these systemic issues, this research aimed to understand why Black men are disproportionately detained under Mental Health legislation and why they report more traumatic, coercive experiences than their White counterparts. It then co-produced solutions with Black men, their families, communities, and health and social care professionals. This is the first study to unite over 200 stakeholders to to co-produce policy and practice recommendations for change. The Silences Framework (TSF) was used as the overarching theoretical framework along with Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) as the participatory action research method. This paper is novel, as the application of TSF fills an important, theoretical gap in the empirical work on mental health and discrimination. Reflexive thematic analysis and methodological triangulation were used to analyse and synthesise the data including: 1:1 interviews with professionals; focus groups with Black men, family members and Black community pillars; EBCD events and parliamentary symposiums. Three themes: (1) 'Identities Beyond the Mask', (2) 'Re-Humanising Detention', and (3) 'Radical Reform' were co-developed with participants. Findings identify stigma, mistrust, discrimination and institutional racism are at the helm of the problem. Seven policy and practice recommendations were co-created to begin to address institutional injustice in psychiatry and better serve the Black community during mental health crisis. This paper presents an original, first of its kind study, investigating the experiences of community stakeholders and professionals and makes a significant contribution that informs policy makers and professionals working in a wide range of mental health and custodial settings around the world.

Identifiers

PMID41662107
PMCPMC12798615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.