ArticlePLOS mental health2025
From mental health detention to health systems reform: Co-producing policy and practice recommendations with Black men, their communities, and health and social care professionals.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Decision-Making for Rapid Tranquillisation in Adult Forensic Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Qualitative Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Stigma, race, and testimonial injustice in mental health detention: Professionals experience of Compulsory Assessment and Treatment under The Mental Health Act 1983.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"I can't breathe," is the phrase that has come to symbolise broad forms of systemic suffocation experienced by Black communities within mental health systems. Positioning Black men, within the context of health and social dynamics, involves understanding the unique systemic barriers they face. Using mental health detention as the entry point to explore these systemic issues, this research aimed to understand why Black men are disproportionately detained under Mental Health legislation and why they report more traumatic, coercive experiences than their White counterparts. It then co-produced solutions with Black men, their families, communities, and health and social care professionals. This is the first study to unite over 200 stakeholders to to co-produce policy and practice recommendations for change. The Silences Framework (TSF) was used as the overarching theoretical framework along with Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) as the participatory action research method. This paper is novel, as the application of TSF fills an important, theoretical gap in the empirical work on mental health and discrimination. Reflexive thematic analysis and methodological triangulation were used to analyse and synthesise the data including: 1:1 interviews with professionals; focus groups with Black men, family members and Black community pillars; EBCD events and parliamentary symposiums. Three themes: (1) 'Identities Beyond the Mask', (2) 'Re-Humanising Detention', and (3) 'Radical Reform' were co-developed with participants. Findings identify stigma, mistrust, discrimination and institutional racism are at the helm of the problem. Seven policy and practice recommendations were co-created to begin to address institutional injustice in psychiatry and better serve the Black community during mental health crisis. This paper presents an original, first of its kind study, investigating the experiences of community stakeholders and professionals and makes a significant contribution that informs policy makers and professionals working in a wide range of mental health and custodial settings around the world.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.