Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662100›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Persons suffering from severe and persistent mental illness with a persistent death wish: A cross-sectional study of the Reakiro care model.

Thijs Vanhie, Sofie Verdegem, Patrick Onghena, Joris Vandenberghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thijs VanhieReakiro, University Psychiatric Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-6260
Sofie VerdegemReakiro, University Psychiatric Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick OnghenaMethods, Individual and Cultural Differences, Affect and Social Behavior (MICAS), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-8312
Joris VandenbergheDepartment of Neurosciences, University Hospitals and University Psychiatric Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3744-0304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons who suffer from unbearable psychiatric illness and a persistent death wish (chronic suicidality and/or a psychiatric euthanasia request) are an understudied subgroup of persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI). They receive tailored care in Reakiro, a Belgian drop-in, care and expertise centre, where persons can enrol in existential counselling or peer support groups. Suicidology and psychiatric euthanasia literature identify several risk and protective factors that play a central role in the process of death wishes: meaning, hope, empowerment, suicidal ideation, existential anxiety, and psychosocial dysfunctioning. The aim of the study is to describe these central factors in this subgroup of persons attending Reakiro and compare them with other patient samples worldwide in order to position this subgroup in terms of severity of suffering. Another aim was to evaluate how the Reakiro care was experienced by the users. The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (M = 21.78, SD = 8.48), Netherlands Empowerment List (M = 113.39, SD = 20.42), Herth Hope Index (M = 24.15; SD = 5.40), Meaning In Life Measurement (M = 5.39, SD = 1.50), Existential Concerns Questionnaire (M = 62.13, SD = 12.11), and Outcome Questionnaire-45 (M = 98.93, SD = 20.50) showed very high suicidal ideation and severe suffering across all domains. The Reakiro sample scored almost exclusively worse on all factors compared with 20 samples worldwide. Users perceived Reakiro care as helpful, with individual counseling services as most helpful. Reakiro care seems to be a promising model appealing to this subgroup of persons with SPMI and a persistent death wish. These results should be interpreted with caution, as the cross-sectional design has several limitations. Replication or falsification with forthcoming longitudinal data is needed. Clinical implications of the results are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID41662100
PMCPMC12798602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.