ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Measuring the experience of social trauma: Development and evaluation of the Social Devaluation Questionnaire.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial discrimination, racial trauma, and complex post-traumatic stress disorder: the role of emotion dysregulation as a mediating factor in Black, African, and Afrodiasporic people in Germany.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Social devaluation and mental health among refugees in the Middle East.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stressful events and conditions can affect mental health. However, the psychopathological consequences of adverse events depend on how individuals think and feel during these experiences. Current instruments assessing peritraumatic distress focus on dysfunctional appraisal types, negative emotions, and dissociative experiences with little or no attention to social emotions. To fill this gap, this study describes the development and initial psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the affective response to stressful or traumatic events that threaten a person's social status. Based on theoretical assumptions about reactions to social stressors, we developed the Social Devaluation Questionnaire (SODEQ) to assess the proposed affective state of social devaluation, consisting of specific emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and physiological facets. We tested the SODEQ on data from four studies, three online surveys with convenience samples totaling about N = 1200 participants and one face-to-face survey with N = 511 Syrian refugees living in refugee camps in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. In each of the studies, social devaluation was assessed using a specific index event, i.e., emotional abuse, peer victimization, abandonment, and post-migration stress as a refugee. We found evidence for the reliability of the instrument and the validity of both the instrument and the construct. Factor analyses indicated that items clustered into highly correlated components but supported treating social devaluation as a unified affect. In each study, the SODEQ score was associated with both the severity of the index event and indicators of psychopathology, and social devaluation partially or fully mediated the relationship between event severity and outcomes. Social devaluation appears to be a meaningful construct representing an affective response to an intense social stressor that contributes to psychopathology. The SODEQ seems to be a valuable tool for identifying mechanisms behind symptoms resulting from threats to one's social integrity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.