Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662065›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Receiving support for mental health problems from family and friends: Measurement and impact on mental health, relationships, and help-seeking.

Amy J Morgan, Judith Wright, Andrew J Mackinnon, Nicola J Reavley, Alyssia Rossetto, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Anthony F Jorm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy J MorganCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-0540
Judith WrightCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Andrew J MackinnonCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Nicola J ReavleyCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Alyssia RossettoCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Long Khanh-Dao LeHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Anthony F JormCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health-related discrimination by friends, family members and intimate partners is especially common, particularly in the form of avoidance and dismissive reactions. In contrast, good quality initial support (mental health first aid) is thought to improve help-seeking and mental health outcomes, although there are few studies that have examined this. This study aimed to develop a measure of mental health support skills that could be self-reported by the recipient of help, and to use this measure to test whether better quality support was related to better outcomes. We recruited 1116 adults from Prolific who reported a recent mental health problem or crisis and were helped by someone close to them such as a family member or friend. Participants completed a recipient version of the Mental Health Support Scale, which asked about actions the other person took to support them, based on mental health first aid guidelines. They also completed measures assessing convergent and divergent validity and perceived impact of the support from their helper. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a scale with two factors of recommended and not recommended actions with acceptable psychometric properties. Receiving recommended mental health first aid support was associated with perceived benefits by the recipient of help, including improved mental health (r = .37), a closer relationship with their helper (r = .39), and impact on help seeking from a doctor (r = .45), mental health professional (r = .49) or a phone or digital mental health service (r = .38). These findings provide empirical evidence for the potential benefits of upskilling community members in effective mental health first aid support.

Identifiers

PMID41662065
PMCPMC12798267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.