ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Stakeholders' perceptions of recovery from psychosis in Blantyre, Malawi: Definitions, goals, and interventions.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goals for recovery from psychosis are perceived differently among those who have been directly impacted by the illness: people with lived experience, caregivers, community members, and those providing treatment. Such differences can limit effective recovery. Understanding the perceptions and goals of each of these groups and the resources needed in different settings is crucial to delivering treatments leading to recovery. Little is known about these perceptions in low- and middle-income countries like Malawi. To understand different stakeholders' definitions of and goals for recovery, and the necessary resources needed to achieve recovery from psychosis in Malawi, we conducted a qualitative study at an outpatient mental health clinic in Malawi involving in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with key informants (n = 48), including people with lived experience (PWLE) and their caregivers, medical practitioners, traditional healers, and community and religious leaders. A thematic approach was used for analysis. All groups shared similar perspectives on recovery, viewing it as the cessation of psychotic symptoms and a return to premorbid function. The cessation of psychotic symptoms included stopping hearing voices and the return of socially appropriate behaviour. A return to premorbid function was described as being able to fully engage in activities of daily living, social interactions, and occupational responsibilities. In contrast to medical practitioners, PWLE additionally emphasized the importance of stopping medications, in part to avoid side effects like sedation. Common subthemes on the goal of recovery included self-reliance and reintegration into the community. To achieve recovery and meet the goals for recovery, all stakeholders reported a need for medication adherence, community involvement, government involvement, and counselling. However, PWLE also noted that recovery was not as complete if one was still on medications. Successful recovery requires a multidimensional approach involving different institutions and stakeholders. Community-based rehabilitation programs may help facilitate cooperation and integration of care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.