ArticlePLOS mental health2025
This and that in depression: Cross-linguistic semantic effects.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Identification of Acoustic Voice Features for Depression: A Cross-Sectional Study of Vietnamese and Japanese Datasets.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demonstratives (in English "this" and "that") are pivotal to human communication, facilitating joint attention and the establishment of a common ground of reference. All languages have at least two forms, typically distinguishing proximal from distal space, where "space" is defined by a range of context-dependent physical, psychological, social and referent-intrinsic factors. Recent work based on the Demonstrative Choice Task (DCT) has indicated, that in the absence of a guiding context, demonstrative reference may capture an experienced or emotional proximity to the referent concepts, and that semantic differences in responses allow implicit inferences on individual differences in psychological space related to depression. The present paper investigated the extent to which these patterns generalize across languages, including German, Spanish, Italian, Russian, Chinese and Tagalog Filipino samples. DCT-based classification models robustly outperformed baseline models in all languages except for Chinese, and showed similar semantic patterns as observed for English. Particularly negative emotion dimensions were consistently among the most important features across models, for which choice of the proximal demonstrative form was more frequent in the depression group than the control group. The opposite pattern was observed for positive emotion features, however, these effects were more variable across languages. Results suggest that simple lexical choices in the DCT capture semantic differences in experiential states related to depression, and may be used to map individuals along a multidimensional semantic space, potentially providing novel insights into individual differences in disorder states and etiology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.