ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Pathways, predictors and paradoxes of illbeing and wellbeing in older adults: Insights from a UK Biobank study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promoting holistic wellbeing during the polycrisis: An essay on inner development through the martial art of Wing Chun.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the first UK Biobank analysis to concurrently model subjective wellbeing and illbeing within a unified biopsychosocial framework, offering a novel, data-rich perspective on psychological functioning in later life. While wellbeing and illbeing are often studied in isolation, there is growing recognition that their determinants may differ in kind and form. We address this gap by examining how biological, psychological, and social factors dynamically shape both outcomes in a large community-dwelling sample. Drawing on data from 8,047 participants (mean age = 64.8 years; 46.7% male; 90.7% White British), we constructed a theory-informed partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) linking heart rate variability (HRV), meaning-oriented behaviour (MOB), resilience, social connectedness, and lifetime adversity to wellbeing and illbeing. Model robustness was supported through 10,000-sample bootstrapping and split-half replication. Network centrality analysis (NCA) was used to identify key drivers, and Bayesian regression was applied to test non-linear functional forms for each path, validated using a held-out test dataset. MOB emerged as the strongest direct predictor of both increased wellbeing and reduced illbeing. HRV influenced wellbeing indirectly via psychosocial mediators. Adversity had the largest total effect on illbeing but no direct effect on wellbeing. Together, predictors accounted for ~52% of variance in both outcomes. Bayesian models revealed exponential, cubic, and logarithmic forms, indicating that conditions optimising wellbeing are not merely the inverse of those reducing illbeing. These findings offer a detailed mapping of non-linear biopsychosocial pathways in older adults and challenge the assumption that wellbeing and illbeing lie on a single continuum. The study provides a robust empirical foundation for developing process-based, context-sensitive mental health interventions. Longitudinal and more demographically diverse studies are now needed to test causal directions and broader generalisability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.